|

List Price: $12.95
Our Price: $1.00
You Save: 92%

Product Details:
Type: Paperback
Item#: c7263

submit a review
|
|
How environmentalism has replaced Communism as the biggest threat to human freedom and prosperity
Blue Planet in Green Shackles: What Is Endangered -- Climate Or Freedom?
by Vaclav Klaus
The largest threat to freedom, democracy, the market
economy, and prosperity at the beginning of the 21st
century is no longer socialism or Communism. It is,
instead, the ambitious, arrogant, unscrupulous ideology of
environmentalism. So writes Vaclav Klaus, president of the
Czech Republic, in Blue Planet in Green Shackles: What Is
Endangered -- Climate Or Freedom? In this brilliantly argued
book, Klaus argues that the environmental movement has
transformed itself into an ideology that seeks to restrict
human activities at any cost, and that policies being
proposed to address global warming are both economically
harmful -- especially to poor nations -- and utterly
unjustified by current science.
(continued from above)
Even through environmentalism boasts about its
scientific basis, argues Klaus, it is, in fact, essentially
a metaphysical ideology that refuses to see the world,
nature, and humankind as they really are. It has no regard
for technological progress and takes the current state of
the world and nature as an untouchable standard, any
changes to which would be a fatal jeopardy. Moreover, the
environmentalists' attitude toward nature is analogous to
the Marxist approach to economics: the aim in both cases is
to replace free enterprise and individual liberty by the
would-be optimal, central, or -- using today's fashionable
adjective -- global planning of world development.
In Blue Planet in Green Shackles, you'll discover:
- How poor countries have been taken hostage by
environmentalists, who propose halting human progress at
immense costs
- Environmentalism as a quasi-religious and profoundly
anti-human ideology that shares many traits with Marxism
- How, in pursuit of a utopian dream of a perfectly
"natural" world, today's environmentalists aspire to
change humankind, human behavior, the structure of
society, the system of values -- simply everything
- Political techniques environmentalists have borrowed from
socialism -- such as masking their attacks on human
freedom with humane and compassionate slogans
- How the bizarre essence of environmentalism becomes clear
when we see how the character of environmentalist attacks
changes over time
- The author's debate with Al Gore and critique of his
book, Earth in the Balance, and his Oscar-winning
documentary, An Inconvenient Truth
- How Gore's moralism is symptomatic of environmentalists
- Fundamental economic laws that are completely neglected
by environmentalists
- Cui bono? How the advocates and promoters of the global
warming hypotheses are mostly scientists who profit from
their research, both financially and in the form of
scientific recognition
- The long-since-disproven myth of nonrenewable resource
exhaustion that drives environmentalist efforts to reduce
and regulate consumption
- The importance of wealth in solving the problems we face
- Why technological changes will be more far-reaching than
climate changes
- Why developing countries' best defense against climate
risks is their own economic development
- How failure to factor in technological progress and
economic growth leads to an overestimate of the effects
of climate change
- The so-called "precautionary principle": how
environmentalists misuse it to justify intervention
without evidence
- Problems with "renewable" energy
- What is really happening with global warming -- and why,
if it's man-made, does it occur on other planets?
- The benefits of global warming
- The effects of political influence on science
- The "hockey stick" debate
- Nature climate variability and the nature of current
warming
- The political nature of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change
- Why economic growth is the solution to real environmental
problems -- and why the proper response to so-called
global warming is to do nothing. Yes, nothing

|
|